Effect on performance of learning a pilates skill with or without a mirror

References 

1. Bennett S, Davids K. The manipulation of vision during the powerlift squat: Exploring the boundaries of the specificity of learning hypothesis. Res. Q. Exercise Sport. 1995;66(3):210–218
2. Bernstein J. Mirror, mirror on the Dojo wall. Are you good for training after all?. Black Belt. 1986;24(11):68–70
3. Davlin CD, Sands WA, Shultz BB. Influence of vision on kinesthetic awareness while somersaulting. Int. Sports J. 2002;6(2):172–178
4. Dearborn K, Ross R. Dance learning and the mirror. J. Dance Educ. 2006;6(4):109–115
5. Dearborn K, Harring K, O’Rourke E, Young C. Mirror and phrase difficulty influence dancer attention and body satisfaction. J. Dance Educ. 2006;6(4):116–123
6. Guedon O, Gauthier G, Cole J, Vercher J, Blouin J. Adaptation in visuomanual tracking depends on intact proprioception. J. Mot. Behav. 1998;30:234–248
   • CrossRef
7. Jeka JJ, Ribeiro P, Oie K, Lackner JR. The structure of somatosensory information for human postural control. Mot. Control. 1998;2:13–33
8. Klein RM. Attention and visual dominance: a chronometric analysis. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 1977;3:365–378
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
9. Lynch, J.A., 2006. The effect of mirror feedback in learning a frontal plane motor skill on students in a Pilates mat program. Unpublished thesis, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA.
10. Mannon K, Anderson T, Cheetham P, Cornwall MW, McPoil T. A comparison of two motion analysis systems for the measurement of two-dimensional rearfoot motion during walking. Foot Ankle Int. 1997;18:427–431
    • MEDLINE
11. Manser, M.P., 1992. Effects of relative frequency of concurrent visual feedback on serial skill acquisition and retention. Unpublished thesis, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana. p. 96.
12. Marks R, Karkouti E. Evaluation of the reliability of reflective marker placements. Physiother. Res. Int. 1996;1(1):50–61
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
13. Proteau L. On the specificity of learning and the role of visual information for movement control. In:  Proteau L,  Elliot D editor. Vision and Motor Control. New York: Elsevier; 1992;p. 67–103
14. Proteau L, Tremblay L, DeJaeger D. Practice does not diminish the role of visual information in on-line control of a precision walking task: support for the specificity of practice hypothesis. J. Mot. Behav. 1998;30:143–151
    • CrossRef
15. Radell AA, Adame DD, Cole SP. Effect of teaching with mirrors on body image and locus of control in women college ballet dancers. Percept. Mot. Skills. 2002;95:1239–1247
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
16. Robertson S, Elliott D. Specificity of learning and dynamic balance. Res. Q. Exercise Sport. 1996;67:69–76
17. Sewall LP, Reeve TG, Day RA. Effect of concurrent visual feedback on acquisition of a weightlifting skill. Percept. Mot. Skills. 1988;67:715–718
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
18. Thomas JR, Nelson JK, Silverman SJ. Research Methods in Physical Activity. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2005;
19. Tremblay L, Proteau L. Specificity of practice: the case of powerlifting. Res. Q. Exercise Sport. 1998;69(3):284–289
20. Vincent WJ. Statistics in Kinesiology. second ed.. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1999;
21. Williams AM, Weigelt C, Harris M, Scott MA. Age-related differences in vision and proprioception in a lower limb interceptive task: the effects of skill level and practice. Res. Q. Exercise Sport. 2002;73:386–396