Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies
Volume 13, Issue 3 , Pages 229-238, July 2009

Rolfing structural integration treatment of cervical spine dysfunction

  • Helen James, MPT (Professor Emerita)

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Therapy, California State University, Fresno, USA
  • ,
  • Luis Castaneda (Student Physical Therapist)

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Therapy, California State University, Fresno, USA
  • ,
  • Marilyn E. Miller, PhD, PT, GCS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Therapy, University of St. Augustine for Health Sciences at San Diego, San Diego, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
    • Formerly with: California State University, Fresno, USA.
  • ,
  • Thomas Findley, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Center for Healthcare Knowledge Management, East Orange VA Medical Center, Mailstop 129, 385 Tremont Avenue, East Orange, NJ 07018, USA
    • Tel.: +19736761000x2713; fax: +19733957114.

Received 14 September 2007; received in revised form 28 June 2008; accepted 1 July 2008.

Summary 

Background

Misalignments in the body compromise the architectural integrity. At the tissue level, fascia shortens and thickens as the body engages in compensatory strategies to maintain itself upright; these changes are known as myofascial contractions. In physical therapy, there are several methods by which practitioners treat neck dysfunction. However, studies showing the effect of those techniques are limited.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of rolfing structural integration (RSI) in neck motion and pain levels of 31 subjects who received RSI. RSI is a type of therapy that focuses on aligning the human body with gravity.

Methods

This retrospective study, over a period of 3 years of clinical practice, analyzes changes in motion and pain levels at the neck for 31 subjects who completed the RSI in 10 basic sessions. Participants were evaluated before and after they received RSI. The data collected included: age, sex, occupation, referral source, diagnosis, height, weight, photographs of postural views, range of motion (ROM), pain, and functional complaints. ROM was assessed with the use of an arthordial protractor. Data analysis using three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tested the hypothesis at a significance of 0.5.

Results

The mean pain levels and active range of motion (AROM) of the neck before RSI significantly changed after the treatment (p<0.5): there was a decrease in pain and an increase in AROM. Pain levels/AROM-Age within-subject effect demonstrated significant difference only in pain at best and rotation right; the mean pain levels in the older group decreased by 67%, and the mean AROM for rotation right in the younger group increased by 34%.

Discussion

In this sample, pain now was reduced more than pain best and pain worst. Increased motion for lateral flexion was more than rotation, extension, and flexion.

Conclusion

This investigation demonstrates that the basic 10 sessions of RSI, when applied by a physical therapist with advanced RSI certification, is capable of significantly decreasing pain and increasing AROM in adult subjects, male and female, with complaints of cervical spine dysfunction regardless of age.

Keywords: RSI, Structural integration, Fascia, Rolfing, Motion, Pain, Neck, Physical therapy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1360-8592(08)00139-3

doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2008.07.002

Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies
Volume 13, Issue 3 , Pages 229-238, July 2009