Criterion validity of a computer-based tutorial for teaching waist circumference self-measurement

References 

1. Berner ES. Clinical Decision Support Systems: Theory and Practice. New York, NY: Springer; 1999;
2. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet. 1986;I:307–310
3. Bouchard C, Blair SN, Haskell WL. Physical Activity and Health. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2007;
4. Coiera E. Guide to Medical Informatics, The Internet and Telemedicine. London: Arnold; A member of the Hodder Headline Group; 1997;
5. Gardner JC, von Ingersleben G, Heyano SL, Chesnut CH. An interactive tutorial-based training technique for vertebral morphometry. Osteoporosis International. 2001;12:63–70
6. Han TS, Lean ME. Self-reported waist circumference compared with the ‘Waist Watcher’ tape-measure to identify individuals at increased health risk through intra-abdominal fat accumulation. British Journal of Nutrition. 1998;80:81–88
7. Han TS, van Leer EM, Seidell JC, Lean ME. Waist circumference action levels in the identification of cardiovascular risk factors: prevalence study in a random sample. BMJ. 1995;311:1401–1405
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
8. Heymsfield SB, Lohman TG, Wang Z, Going SB. Human Body Composition. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2005;
9. Heyward V, Wagner D. Applied Body Composition Assessment. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2004;
10. Hoffman J. Norms for Fitness, Performance, and Health. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2006;
11. Jackson AS, Pollock ML, Gettman LR. Intertester reliability of selected skinfold and circumference measurements and percent fat estimates. Research Quarterly. 1978;49:546–551
    • MEDLINE
12. Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Ross R. Body mass index, waist circumference, and health risk: evidence in support of current National Institutes of Health guidelines. Archives of International Medicine. 2002;162:2074–2079
13. Kohlstadt I. Scientific Evidence for Musculoskeletal, Bariatric, and Sports Nutrition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Fancis Group; 2006;
14. Lean MEJ. Clinical Handbook of Weight Management. Independence, KY: Taylor & Francis; 2003;
15. Lean MJ, Han TS. Waist worries. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2002;76:699–700
16. Lean ME, Han TS, Morrison CE. Waist circumference as a measure for indicating need for weight management. BMJ. 1995;311:158–161
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
17. Lean ME, Han TS, Deurenberg P. Predicting body composition by densitometry from simple anthropometric measurements. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1996;63:4–14
18. Maud PJ, Foster C. Physiolgical Assessment of Human Fitness. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2006;
19. McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL. Sports & Exercise Nutrition. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005;
20. McArdle WD, Katch FI, Katch VL. Exercise Physiology: Energy, Nutrition, & Human Performance. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007;
21. Norris AC. Essentials of Telemedicine and Telecare. West Sussex, UK: Wiley; 2002;
22. Shortliffe EH, Perreault LE. Medical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine. New York, NY: Springer; 2001;
23. Slack WV. Cybermedicine: How Computing Empowers Doctors and Patients for Better Health Care. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Company; 2001;
24. Tate DF, Wing RR, Winett RA. Using Internet technology to deliver a behavioral weight loss program. JAMA. 2001;285:1172–1177
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
25. Tate DF, Jackvony EH, Wing RR. Effects of Internet behavioral counseling on weight loss in adults at risk for type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2003;289:1833–1836
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
26. Wang J, Thornton JC, Bari S, Williamson B, Gallagher D, Heymsfield SB, et al. Comparisons of waist circumferences measured at 4 sites. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2003;77:379–384
27. Williams CA, Bale P. Bias and limits of agreement between hydrodensitometry, bioelectrical impedance and skinfold calipers measures of percentage body fat. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology. 1998;77:271–277
    • MEDLINE