Are systematic reviews always accurate?

References 

1. Assendelft W, Morton S, Yu E, et al. Spinal manipulative therapy for low back pain. A meta-analysis of effectiveness relative to other therapies. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2003;138:871–881
2. Bockenhauer S, Julliard K, Sing K, et al. Quantifiable effects of osteopathic manipulative techniques on patients with chronic asthma. Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 2002;102(7):371–375
3. Canter P, Ernst E. Sources of bias in reviews of spinal manipulation for back pain. Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift. 2005;117(9–10):333–341
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
4. Ernst E. Musculoskeletal conditions and complementary/alternative medicine. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology. 2004;18(4):539–556
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (168 KB)
   • CrossRef
5. Ernst E, Canter P. A systematic review of systematic reviews of spinal manipulation. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2006;99:189–193
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
6. Mehling WE, Hamel KA, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of breath therapy for patients with chronic low-back pain altern. Therapeutic Health and Medicine. 2005;11(4):44–52
7. Yates H, Vardy T, Kuchera M, et al. Effects of OMT and concentric and eccentric maximal effort exercise on women with MS. Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 2002;102(5):267–275