Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies
Volume 11, Issue 1 , Pages 9-16, January 2007

Effects of traditional Thai massage versus joint mobilization on substance P and pain perception in patients with non-specific low back pain

  • Surussawadi Mackawan, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel./fax: +6643202085.
  • ,
  • Wichi Eungpinichpong, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
  • ,
  • Rungthip Pantumethakul, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
  • ,
  • Uraiwon Chatchawan, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
  • ,
  • Tokamol Hunsawong, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
  • ,
  • Pricha Arayawichanon, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand

Received 11 July 2005; received in revised form 16 October 2005; accepted 1 November 2005.

Summary 

Although both Traditional Thai Massage (TTM) and joint mobilization have been practiced in Thailand to reduce musculoskeletal pain, a comparative study of these in relieving pain is not been found in the literature. The purpose of this study was to examine the immediate effects of TTM versus joint mobilization on substance P and pain perception in patients with non-specific low back pain. Sixty-seven adults with non-specific low back pain were randomly assigned to receive either TTM (35 people) or joint mobilization (32 people). The duration of each treatment was 10min. The levels of substance P in saliva and a visual analog scale (VAS) were measured before and 5min after each treatment. Paired t-test was used to compare outcome variables at baseline with outcome measures 5min after each treatment. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed to compare the difference between groups. Both groups showed a decrease in the level of substance P after treatment when compared with levels pre-treatment (73.86±62.31pg/ml versus 50.43±64.39pg/ml in TTM and 80.61±85.26pg/ml versus 56.27±72.77pg/ml in joint mobilization; and 0.006; 95%CI: 4.03–42.82 and 7.48–41.19, respectively). Additionally, there was a marked decrease in VAS after treatment in both groups (4.22±1.98 versus 2.45±1.75 in Thai massage and 4.35±1.71 versus 3.39±1.66 in joint mobilization; and 0.002, 95%CI: 1.12–2.40 and 0.37–1.55, respectively). There was no significant difference in the substance P level after treatment between the two groups. However, the VAS pain score was slightly different between the groups after treatment (0.88; 95% CI: 0.16–1.59; ), where the TTM group reported less pain than the joint mobilization group (2.48±0.25 versus 3.36±0.25 VAS, respectively). Both TTM and joint mobilization can relieve pain in patients with non-specific low back pain. However, TTM yields slightly more beneficial effects than joint mobilization.

Keywords: Non-specific low back pain, Traditional Thai massage, Joint mobilization, Substance P

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1360-8592(05)00132-4

doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2005.11.001

Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies
Volume 11, Issue 1 , Pages 9-16, January 2007