Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies
Volume 10, Issue 4 , Pages 266-275, October 2006

A comparative study of Thai massage and Swedish massage relative to physiological and psychological measures

  • Virginia S. Cowen, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health, Physical Education, and Dance, Queensborough Community College, The City University of New York, 222-05 56th Avenue, Bayside, NY 11364, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +17186316322; fax: +17186316333.
  • ,
  • Lee Burkett, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Exercise and Wellness, Arizona State University, USA
  • ,
  • Joshua Bredimus

      Affiliations

    • Department of Exercise and Wellness, Arizona State University, USA
  • ,
  • Daniel R. Evans

      Affiliations

    • Department of Exercise and Wellness, Arizona State University, USA
  • ,
  • Sandra Lamey

      Affiliations

    • Department of Exercise and Wellness, Arizona State University, USA
  • ,
  • Theresa Neuhauser

      Affiliations

    • Department of Exercise and Wellness, Arizona State University, USA
  • ,
  • Lawdan Shojaee

      Affiliations

    • Department of Exercise and Wellness, Arizona State University, USA

Received 11 May 2005; received in revised form 12 July 2005; accepted 14 August 2005.

Summary 

Many cultures have a massage or touch-based therapy that has been influenced by the development of culture over time. The origins of Thai massage (TM) can be traced to oriental medicine and yoga. Swedish massage (SM), the most popular type of massage practiced in the US, is based on anatomy learned from dissection. To date TM has been largely unexplored. The purpose of this study was to compare and contrast a single general massage treatment, using one of two different styles of massage, on physiological and psychological outcomes.

Fifty-three participants enrolled in the study and were randomly assigned to receive one TM or SM treatment. Dependent variables included blood pressure, heart rate, range-of-motion, perceived anxiety, and mood. Physiological assessments (blood pressure, heart rate, range of motion) were conducted immediately before (T1) and after the massage (T2). Psychological assessments (anxiety and mood) were conducted at T1, T2, and at 48-h follow-up (T3).

A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) revealed overall significant differences for the massage. However, there were no differences between the treatment groups. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) for individual dependent variables found significant improvement between T1 and T2 in resting heart rate, ankle plantar flexion, ankle dorsiflexion, and shoulder abduction/rotation. Significant overall improvement was noted in mood at T2, and in tension-anxiety as well as confusion-bewilderment at T2 and T3 compared to T1. The findings suggest that a single treatment of TM is as effective as SM on general physiological and psychological outcomes.

Keywords: Massage, Flexibility, Stress, Anxiety

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1360-8592(05)00089-6

doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2005.08.006

Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies
Volume 10, Issue 4 , Pages 266-275, October 2006